Platform 04 · Biofuel

Waste in, three streams out

Cellulosic ethanol has never failed for lack of feedstock. It has failed on process economics: slow hydrolysis, dilute sugar liquors, inhibitory by-products, and capital costs that only make sense at enormous scale. This route attacks all four.

Laboratory scale proven Demonstration plant sought
RESIDUE ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS < 4 HOURS GLUCOSE 0.51 T / DRY T PENTOSE 0.50 T / DRY T LIGNIN 22,000 BTU/KG

Laboratory results

Per dry ton of feedstock

The process decomposes the structure of lignocellulosic material, extracts the lignin as a high-energy fuel, and converts both cellulose and hemicellulose into fermentable sugars with practically no detrimental by-products.

>95%Cellulose conversion from corncob
<4 hHydrolysis residence time, against days
138Gallons of ethanol per dry ton of corncob
696KWH electric potential from bagasse lignin
Yield per dry ton, laboratory scale
MeasureCorncobSugar cane bagasse
Cellulose conversion to glucoseabove 95%above 90%
Hemicellulose conversionabout 99%about 99%
Glucose yieldmore than 0.51 tonmore than 0.48 ton
Pentose yield (mainly xylose)about 0.50 tonabout 0.37 ton
Lignin producedabout 150 lbabout 400 lb
Ethanol yield138 gallons (523 L)117 gallons (443 L)
Electric potential from lignin271 KWH696 KWH

Electric potential assumes 60% efficiency for thermal energy conversion.

Why it is different

Four constraints, addressed at once

Reaction time

The process controls the speed of the hydrolysis reaction, bringing reactor residence time under four hours where conventional approaches take days. Residence time is reactor volume, and reactor volume is capital.

Liquor concentration

Final glucose concentration can be controlled without additional energy consumption, while still yielding a high concentration of pentose liquor. The liquors come out ready for fermentation, with no intervening concentration step.

By-products

Inhibitory by-products are why many pretreatment routes need a detoxification stage before fermentation. This route largely avoids producing them.

Operating cost

Solvent and cellulolytic enzymes are recovered and recycled, energy consumption is low, and so is the investment in machinery and equipment. Together those change the minimum viable plant size, which is what has kept this industry out of reach for operators who already sit on the feedstock.

HYDROLYSIS RESIDENCE TIME CONVENTIONAL · DAYS < 4 HOURS SOLVENT AND ENZYME RECOVERY REACTOR RECOVERY RECYCLED Feedstock is agricultural waste, so it does not compete with food for land.
Process economics, not chemistry, is what has blocked this industry

Deployment

Where the residue already sits

Corncob, corn stover, rice straw, sugarcane bagasse and other cellulosic agricultural wastes. The deployment case is strongest where lignocellulosic residue already accumulates in volume at a fixed location: sugar mills, corn processing, rice production. No collection network to build, no feedstock to buy.

!

Stated plainly: this is demonstration-stage technology. The figures above are laboratory scale. The gap between laboratory yield and plant yield is exactly where cellulosic ethanol projects have historically failed, and closing it is what the demonstration plant is for. We are seeking a partner to install one and complete the development process.

Licensing & partnerships

Work with us on what comes next

Aybar Ecotechnologies works through licensing, joint ventures, and equity structures. Request the investor brief for a specific platform, or schedule a technical demonstration with our research team.